![]() ![]() Joe Setyon, communications manager for the Goldwater Institute, on Tuesday said they won’t “have any comment at this time.” He said his argument will essentially remain the same as what was presented in Superior Court. 11 with the Hobbs attorney, Timothy Sandefur, going first followed by Laredo. On Tuesday, Pacific Grove city attorney David Laredo said oral arguments before a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, in San Jose, will be held on Oct. Goldwater appealed to the appellate court. The Hobbs lost their case in 2019 when Monterey County Superior Court Judge Lydia Villarreal dismissed the Goldwater Institute’s allegation since Pacific Grove’s short-term rental licensing agreement clearly stated that the term of the license was for 12 months and there was no guarantee of renewal. ![]() Short-term rentals are properties leased out for 30 days or fewer. The case dates back to 2018 when a former Pacific Grove couple, William and Susan Hobbs, sued the city with the backing of Phoenix-based Goldwater Institute, alleging the city denied them their due process rights when a lottery system prohibited them from renting out their home as a vacation property, also known as a short-term rental. PACIFIC GROVE - In a couple of weeks, a state appeals court will hear oral arguments in a closely watched case brought by a conservative Arizona think tank against the city of Pacific Grove for what plaintiffs argue is an illegal way in which the city controls short-term rentals. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |